Legal Opinion

Diggs v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 13, 1922No. Civ. No. 2423PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The trial court sustained a demurrer to an amended complaint without leave to amend, the demurrer being both general and special, and from the judgment entered thereon the appeal has been taken. It is not disputed that the basis of the action is found in a certain written contract of January 20, 1919, between respondent and one C. W. Levisee. The complaint is too voluminous to set out in full, but respondent has furnished a fair synopsis of it, which we may adopt substantially. It alleges the execution of said contract, which is set out in haec verla, wherein respondent agreed to sell and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Roddy v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  3. Clancy v. . ByrneNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Buckley v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Heizer v. Kingsland & Douglass Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. Marina City Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Shutes v. CheneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Cortella v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Mottashed v. Central & Pacific Improvement Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Hull-Dobbs Co. of Puerto Rico v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API