Legal Opinion
Tackett v. M & G POLYMERS, USA, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 3, 2009No. 07-4515, 07-4516PublishedCited by 1,534 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The Plaintiffs United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC (“USW”) and Hubert Tackett, Woodrow W. Piles, and Harland B. Conley (“Retiree Plaintiffs”) separately appeal the district court’s dismissal of their case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and (b)(6).
The Plaintiffs alleged that, under their collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”), the Defendant M & G Polymers, USA (“M & G”) promised them vested health-care benefits. When Defendant M & G announced it would begin requiring…
3Cases cited29 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1,534 opinions
- M&G Polymers United States, LLC v. TackettSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Javier Luis v. Joseph ZangCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- ABF Freight System, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Gerald Morgan v. Bd. of Prof. Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tenn.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- Vick v. Core CivicDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2018
1,529 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.