Legal Opinion
Rush v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 4, 1990No. C-89-4535 SAWPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WEIGEL, District Judge.
Plaintiff’s suit is bottomed on a contract with Centennial Savings & Loan (“Centennial”) that guaranteed him one year’s salary if Centennial terminated him without cause. The amount of that salary was $105,000. Based upon that contract, plaintiff sues the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation in its corporate capacity (“FDIC Corporate”) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Centennial (“FDIC Receiver”) for three claims: (1) breach of contract; (2) failure to provide benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- James W. Sly and Schorling Schneider on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. P.R. Mallory & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Modzelewski v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Ernest F. Modzelewski v. Resolution Trust Corporation, as Receiver for Merabank, a Federal Savings Bank, Gene E. Rice v. Resolution Trust Corporation, as Receiver for Merabank, a Federal Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Marsa v. Metrobank for Savings, F.S.B.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Crocker v. Resolution Trust Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- Piekarski v. Home Owners Sav. Bank, FSBDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.