Legal Opinion

Emmerling, Etc. v. James C. Curtis Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 19, 1937No. 15,838PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, C. J.

Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal predicated upon the theory that the action of the trial court from which appellants now seek to appeal does not come within the class of orders or judgments from which appeals are permitted under our statutes authorizing the same.

It appears that on October 4, 1984, the appellee filed its petition in the trial court, making the appellants parties defendant thereto,' seeking to have the final report of the administratrix of the estate of one Nicholas Emmerling, deceased, set aside as provided by Sec. 6-1424 Burns 1983, §3220 Baldwin’s 1934.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Woodard v. KillenIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Enmeier v. BlaizeIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Stout v. StoutIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Wall v. City of MuncieIndiana Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Hughes v. PattonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Manor v. ManorIndiana Supreme Court · 1944
  2. James C. Curtis & Co. v. BlumeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Blume v. First Nat. Bank of ChicagoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Staggs v. WrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Tolles v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API