Legal Opinion

James C. Curtis & Co. v. Blume

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 14, 1944No. 17,197PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoyse, P. J.

This is an action by appellant to set aside an order of final settlement in the estate of Nicholas Emmerling, deceased. The cause was submitted to the court without the intervention of a jury on appellant’s amended complaint in one paragraph, appellees’ answer in four paragraphs, and appellant’s reply in four paragraphs. Inasmuch as the facts hereinafter set out show the respective contentions of the parties, we do not deem it necessary to set out the pleadings. The trial court found for appellees and judgment was rendered accordingly. Appellant’s motion for a new trial was overruled, which…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Estate of Stanley v. PenceIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Graham v. RussellIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Caldwell v. UlshIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Ayrshire Coal Co. v. ThurmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Woods v. MatlockIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fulton v. Van SlykeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Matter of Estate of BankoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Blume v. First Nat. Bank of ChicagoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Rogers v. National City Bank of EvansvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API