Legal Opinion

Jack Erickson & Associates v. Hesselgesser

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 9, 1996No. B096056PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STONE (S. J.), P. J.

Robert D. Hesselgesser appeals from a judgment awarding respondent, Jack Erickson and Associates, $112,000 on a promissory note. We affirm and hold that the judgment is not barred by the antideficiency provision of Code of Civil Procedure section 580b.

Facts

On June 15, 1989, appellant and his wife, Jane Hesselgesser, purchased a residence from respondent for $560,000. Appellant put $56,000 down, borrowed $392,000 from Great Western Savings, and gave respondent a $112,000 note secured by a second deed of trust.

Appellant bought the residence for investment purposes and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Freedland v. GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Brown v. JensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Spangler v. MemelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Valinda Builders, Inc. v. BissnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Coker v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.California Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API