Jack Erickson & Associates v. Hesselgesser
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STONE (S. J.), P. J.
Robert D. Hesselgesser appeals from a judgment awarding respondent, Jack Erickson and Associates, $112,000 on a promissory note. We affirm and hold that the judgment is not barred by the antideficiency provision of Code of Civil Procedure section 580b.
Facts
On June 15, 1989, appellant and his wife, Jane Hesselgesser, purchased a residence from respondent for $560,000. Appellant put $56,000 down, borrowed $392,000 from Great Western Savings, and gave respondent a $112,000 note secured by a second deed of trust.
Appellant bought the residence for investment purposes and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Freedland v. GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Brown v. JensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Spangler v. MemelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Valinda Builders, Inc. v. BissnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Coker v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.California Supreme Court · 2016