Legal Opinion

Thornton v. Neiman Marcus

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided March 15, 1994No. Civ. 3:93-CV-1698-HPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SANDERS, Chief Judge.

Before the Court are the following: Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Brief in Support, filed January 18, 1994; Plaintiffs Response and Amendment, both filed February 25, 1994; and Defendant’s Reply, filed March 2, 1994.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Marlene L. Thornton is suing Defendant The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. for discriminating against her on the basis of her sex and race and, in addition, for retaliating against her because she opposed its alleged discriminatory practices.

From October 1986 until her termination on January 20, 1993,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Martin v. Kroger Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1999
  2. Johnson v. DiMarioDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
  3. Edwards v. Galveston-Texas City Pilots & Galtex Pilots Service Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2002
  4. Glover-Dorsey v. University of Texas Medical Branch at GalvestonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2001
  5. Snooks v. University of Houston, Clear LakeDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API