Legal Opinion

State v. a House & 1.37 Acres of Real Property Located at 392 South 600 East

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1994No. 930481PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Chief Justice:

The State appeals a district court order denying the State’s petition, filed pursuant to the Utah Controlled Substances Act, 1 for the forfeiture of a certain house and real property located in Juab County (“the Residence”). The State asserts that in denying forfeiture, the district court made two critical interpre-tory errors: (i) It concluded that the Residence was not a “housing, warehousing, or storage facility” within the meaning of section 58-37-13(1)® of the Code; and (ii) it construed section 58-37-13(1)® to require the State to prove, as a predicate to any…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. State v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1987

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. BabbIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Nelson v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Interwest Construction v. PalmerUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Hall v. Process Instruments & Control, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API