Legal Opinion

Interwest Construction v. Palmer

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1996No. 940616PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Chief Justice:

Following the trial court’s entry of judgment on a contract dispute in favor of Inter-west Construction (“Interwest”) and AH. Palmer and Sons (“Palmer”), Thiokol Corporation (“Thiokol”) appealed to this court, and we poured the appeal to the court of appeals. We then granted certiorari to review the court of appeals’ decision affirming the trial court judgment. See Interwest Constr. v. Palmer, 886 P.2d 92 (Ct.App.1994), cert, granted sub nom. Fiberglass v. Thiokol, 892 P.2d 13 (Utah 1995). Our present review is limited to considering whether the court of appeals erred…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Beck v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Winegar v. Froerer Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Harline v. BarkerUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Williams v. MelbyUtah Supreme Court · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. SME Industries, Inc. v. Thompson, Ventulett, Stainback & Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Sharon Steel Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Bishop v. GenTec Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Schaerrer v. Stewart's Plaza Pharmacy, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Dixon v. Pro Image Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1999

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API