Legal Opinion

United States v. Van Wagenensager, Inc.

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided August 27, 1940PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, District Judge.

The indictment in the above case charges a conspiracy to violate the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. Defendants have moved for a bill of particulars. The motion contains a total of thirty-three demands. The motion is based upon the ground that the indictment does not disclose the crime charged against the defendants with sufficient particularity to enable them to prepare their defense.

The indictment alleges that a conspiracy was begun on or about October 24, 1938, and continued until date of the filing of the indictment. The conspirators are…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mulloney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935
  2. Rubio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
  3. Robinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
  4. United States v. WexlerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1933
  5. United States v. BrownDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1931

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. KahanerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  2. United States v. Climatemp, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
  3. United States v. LiebermanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  4. Fleming v. Southern Kraft Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940
  5. United States v. SimonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API