Fleming v. Southern Kraft Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
Defendant, Southern Kraft Corporation, moves under Rule 12(e), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, for an order requiring the plaintiff to furnish a more definite statement, or in the alternative a bill of particulars of certain matters alleged in the complaint, which it is claimed are not stated with sufficient definiteness or particularity to enable the defendant properly to prepare its responsive pleading or to prepare for trial.
Plaintiff, as Administrator of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (otherwise known as the Wage and Hour…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chandler v. Cutler-Hammer, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1940
- Jacobs v. Peavy-Wilson Lumber Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1940
- United States v. Griffith Amusement Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1940
- Dunleer Co. v. Minter Homes CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1940
- United States v. Van Wagenensager, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Walling v. Fairmont Creamery Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Abram v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1942
- Canuso v. City of Niagara FallsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1945
- Hoffman v. Wilson Line, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
- Flemming v. StillmanDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.