Legal Opinion
Robinson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 17, 1929No. 5665PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
Early in 1925, Cromwell Simon and Harry M. Kassmir, under the firm name of Cromwell Simon & Co., formulated a plan or method for the acquisition of high-grade securities listed on the New York stock exchange by the payment of one-fifth down and the balance in ten equal quarterly installments. A more detailed statement of the plan is not deemed necessary for present purposes, because the fraud charged in the indictment was not in the plan itself, but in its underlying purpose. The indictment returned against Simon, Kassmir, Samuel H. Robinson, Orton E. Goodwin, and J. W.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Durland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Van Riper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Lemon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- Rubio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- Barnard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Himmelfarb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Hewitt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- United States v. Joseph R. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Isaacs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- United States v. D. Spencer Grow and C. Oran MensikCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.