Legal Opinion

People v. Velasquez

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 23, 2003PublishedCited by 155 opinions

POINTS OF COUNSEL

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Chief Judge Kaye.

In these appeals, we are asked to determine whether the right of defendants to be present at sidebar conferences with prospective jurors was violated. In each case, we conclude that it was not.

During jury selection in defendant Foster’s robbery trial, as the record indicates, the court on February 4, 1999, informed prospective jurors that at the conclusion of its remarks, “I will step into the robing room with the attorneys and anyone who *47feels that I have raised an issue that they need to discuss with us will be invited to come in one at a time and tell…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. AntommarchiNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. People v. DokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. People v. KinchenNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. People v. RichettiNew York Court of Appeals · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by155 opinions

  1. People v. CahillNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. The People v. Pamela Hanson, The People v. Julian SilvaNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. People v. AndrewNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. People v. ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. People v. GajadharNew York Court of Appeals · 2007

150 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API