Legal Opinion

Walton v. . Walton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 17, 1919PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from Connor, J., at Spring Term, 1919, of Beetle.

1Opinion of the CourtClaeK, C. J.

This action was begun under ch. 24, Laws 1919, which was enacted as a substitute for Rev., 1567, by the plaintiff against her husband “to have a reasonable subsistence allotted and paid or secured, to her from the estate or earnings of her husband.” The summons was issued 29 April, 1919, returnable 12 May, 1919. The verified complaint used as an affidavit, upon which the warrant of attachment issued, avers that the defendant in July, 1917, abandoned the plaintiff and the child of the marriage in New York, and, returning to Bertie County, brought a suit for the annulment of said marriage. The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pennington v. Fourth National Bank of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Murray v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Thurston v. ThurstonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  4. Bernhardt v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. Cram v. . CramSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. . CaldwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. White v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  3. Kiger v. KigerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. White v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  5. Barber v. . BarberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API