Bernhardt v. . Brown
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
It was admitted that both parties claimed under the North Carolina Estate Company (Limited), and that the land in controversy had been conveyed to the company by deed, in June, 1886.
In response to issues submitted, to which there were no (703) exceptions, the jury found that there had been two execution sales of the land in controversy; that at the first sale, made 6 May, 1889, when the defendant George W. Brown purchased, the sheriff sold under four executions; that at the second sale, made 8 July, 1890, when the plaintiffs (or John Paalzow, under whom they claimed) purchased, the sheriff…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Heidritter v. Elizabeth Oil-Cloth Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Lowe v. . ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Winfree v. . BagleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Blackburn v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Reynolds v. Lloyd Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Hatch v. Alamance Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Hatch v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Dunn v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Piggly-Wiggly Georgia Co. v. May Investing Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.