Legal Opinion

Chope v. Collins

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1976No. 76-293PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants contend that R. C. 5747.02 levies an excise tax,1 not an income tax, because R. C. 5747.02 allegedly provides for a tax levied not upon income, but, instead, upon every individual residing in or earning income in this state. In this view, income merely measures the excise tax upon the individual, rather than constituting, the subject of the tax.

Although an income tax may béár some of the identify*299ing characteristics of an excise tax, the Ohio Constitution does distinguish an excise tax from an income tax. In interpreting the Constitution, at least, an income tax must not be treated…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schell v. DuBoisOhio Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Thorpe v. MahinIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  3. MacLaughlin v. Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Angell v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Lakengren, Inc. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. TeamerOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. WaddellOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Village of Oakwood v. MakarOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Hakim v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Couchot v. State Lottery CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API