City of Elk City v. Coffey
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHTMIRE, Presiding Judge.
The question raised here is whether a municipality has a right to use residential utility easements as alleyways for trash trucks absent a specific use grant for such. The trial court held it may not and we agree.
I
Elk City wanted the trial court, in this action, to issue a mandatory injunction requiring defendants, Mr. and Mrs. Coffey, to remove part of a property line chain link fence which enclosed a ten-foot utility easement located along the north side of the lot.
The City rests its quest upon an interpretation of language creating the easement recited in the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Big Cottonwood Tanner Ditch Co. v. MoyleUtah Supreme Court · 1946
- Story v. HefnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Pinkerton v. PritchardArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- Thompson v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1962
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Scottsdale v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. East Central Oklahoma Electric CooperativeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Southampton Civic Club v. Patricio D. Sanchez, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
- City of Bisbee v. Arizona Water Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- United States v. City of McAlesterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.