Legal Opinion

City of Elk City v. Coffey

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 31, 1977No. 49637PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIGHTMIRE, Presiding Judge.

The question raised here is whether a municipality has a right to use residential utility easements as alleyways for trash trucks absent a specific use grant for such. The trial court held it may not and we agree.

I

Elk City wanted the trial court, in this action, to issue a mandatory injunction requiring defendants, Mr. and Mrs. Coffey, to remove part of a property line chain link fence which enclosed a ten-foot utility easement located along the north side of the lot.

The City rests its quest upon an interpretation of language creating the easement recited in the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Big Cottonwood Tanner Ditch Co. v. MoyleUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Story v. HefnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Pinkerton v. PritchardArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Thompson v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1962

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Scottsdale v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. East Central Oklahoma Electric CooperativeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  3. Southampton Civic Club v. Patricio D. Sanchez, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
  4. City of Bisbee v. Arizona Water Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. United States v. City of McAlesterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API