Legal Opinion

State v. Carosa

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 29, 1996No. 19110-5-IIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Marcella Carosa appeals her convictions of three counts of second degree theft. On each of three different days, Carosa took more than $250 from her employer’s cash registers by removing smaller amounts of money from time to time during her work shift. Theft of $250 or more constitutes second degree theft, a felony; theft of less than $250 is third degree theft, a misdemeanor. Washington follows the rule that multiple takings from the same victim at the same time and place constitute one crime, not multiple crimes. The question underlying all of Carosa’s issues is: Did Carosa commit one…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. StaleyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. KleistWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. HoytCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  4. State v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  2. State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. State v. KinnemanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  4. State of Washington v. Donald Leroy BroersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  5. State of Washington v. Michael David CoxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API