Legal Opinion

State v. Kinneman

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 29, 2003No. 50101-1-IPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAppelwick, J.

— Zachary A. Kinneman, an attorney, made multiple unauthorized withdrawals from his Interest On Lawyer Trust Account (IOLTA) over 16 months. He was convicted of 28 counts of first degree theft and 39 counts of second degree theft. He appeals, asserting that (1) because the multiple counts were not aggregated into one first degree theft count, he was subject to double jeopardy and (2) the State had insufficient evidence to charge him with multiple counts. The State cross-appeals the court’s imposition of an exceptional sentence downward. We affirm *331Kinneman’s conviction, reverse the imposition…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. PetrichWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. AdelWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. AdelWashington Supreme Court · 1998

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. KinnemanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. KinnemanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State Of Washington v. David NovickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  4. State v. JandaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. State v. K.R.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API