Legal Opinion

State v. Kleist

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1995No. 61920-4PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.

— The present case concerns the type of evidence sufficient for and relevant to the valuation of stolen goods to establish degree of theft. Defendant Sandra Sue Kleist has admitted that on August 5, 1992, she took seven articles of clothing without paying from The Bon Marché in downtown Spokane, Washington. She now challenges her conviction for second degree theft.

A guilty verdict of second degree theft demands findings of fact both of a taking and of the value of the goods:

A person is guilty of theft in the second degree if he or she commits theft of:(a) Property or services which exceed(s)…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Davis v. Globe MacHine Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Keeton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. McCurdy v. Union Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. LongshoreWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Robinson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999
  3. State v. LongshoreWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. HermannCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. State v. EhrhardtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API