In Re Cypress Semiconductor Securities Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE CERTAIN PARAGRAPHS; GRANTING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND GRANTING MOTION FOR CORRECTION
WHYTE, District Judge.
The motion of defendants Cypress Semiconductor Corporation (“Cypress”), Mark K. Allen, Ken Goldman, T.J. Rodgers, Marcel Gani, Thomas North and Lowell Turriff (collectively, “defendants”) to dismiss plaintiffs’ second amended complaint (“complaint”) and to strike certain paragraphs, as well as plaintiffs’ motion for correction and partial reconsideration, came on regularly for hearing on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mirkin v. WassermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,473 Maurice Shapiro v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Alfus v. Pyramid Technology Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1990
- In Re Fortune Systems Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987
- Painting Industry of Hawaii Market Recovery Fund v. United States Department of the Air ForceDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1990
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re MicroStrategy, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
- In Re Enron Corp. Sec., Derivative & ERISA Lit.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2003
- Quaak v. Dexia, S.A.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
- Edward J. Goodman Life Income Trust v. Jabil Circuit, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2009
- Hodges v. Akeena Solar, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.