Legal Opinion
In Re Fortune Systems Securities Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 6, 1987No. C-83-3348A WHOPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ORRICK, District Judge.
There are presently before the Court three motions, plaintiffs’ and defendants’ cross-motions for partial summary judgment and defendant Fortune Systems Corporation’s (“Fortune”) motion for judgment on the pleadings. Plaintiff class, purchasers of defendant Fortune’s shares made available pursuant to an initial public offering (“IPO”) conducted on March 4, 1983, 1 allege in their complaint that defendants, consisting of Fortune, its directors, various institutional shareholders of Fortune stock, and the underwriters of the Fortune IPO, 2 participated in…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- In Re Worlds Of Wonder Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- William ALPERN and Russell D. Miller, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v. UTILICORP UNITED, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Joseph v. WilesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- In Re MDC Holdings Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.