Legal Opinion

Ferrara v. Clifton Wright Hat Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 5, 1939PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

As a result of employment in the “wetting down” department of the named defendant’s hat factory the plaintiff developed dermatitis causing incapacity on May 29, 1936. He was paid compensation for total disability, first under a voluntary agreement and afterward under a finding and award, until January 29, 1937. Subsequently he filed a motion for further compensation, but it was denied on the ground that he has been, since January 29, 1937, and now is, able to work. In response to a motion to correct, the commissioner amended the finding by adding that the plaintiff has a susceptibility to a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matter of Jordan v. . Decorative Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Sullivan's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Reilley v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  4. Septimo's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Rakiec v. New Haven Wrecking Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Osterlund v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  2. Czeplicki v. Fafnir Bearing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  3. Clark v. Henry & Wright Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  4. Starks v. University of ConnecticutSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  5. Guerrera v. W. J. Megin, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API