Legal Opinion

Septimo's Case

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 12, 1914PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is a proceeding under the workmen’s compensation act.* The employee, Séptimo, received an injury which arose out of and in the course of his employment, and thereafter, during a part of the period between the date of his injury and that of the filing of his claim with the Industrial Accident Board, he was employed by his former employer and was paid $9 a week. Before he was injured, his weekly wages were $10.

While he was so employed, after his injuries, the mill where he worked was shut down for three and five sevenths weeks, “owing to the slackening up of business.” During this time he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Donovan's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Sullivan's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Diaz's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Bentley's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Johnson's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Percival's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Reilley v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  4. Roller v. WarrenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  5. Durney's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API