State v. Ragan
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
The first assignment of error is based upon the ruling of the court which denied counsel for the defendant leave to read from the statute books the penalty provided for the crime with which defendant was charged. Counsel’s opening statement is subject to the discretion of the trial judge. The latter’s duties are not solely judicial; they are also administrative. In the latter capacity he finds himself as the superintendent of a staff composed of attorneys, witnesses, jurors, clerks, court reporters and others comprising the personnel of the court. The expeditious transaction of judicial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. DaleyOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- State v. HerronMontana Supreme Court · 1892
- Crow v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
- Lipscomb v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- State v. ParrOregon Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. WagnerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. BraleyOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. FolkesOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- State of Oregon v. CahillOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Smallman v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1955
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.