State v. Parr
Oregon Supreme Court
The defendants, Joseph Parr and Samuel Gaston, were indicted, tried and convicted of assault and robbery, being armed with dangerous weapons, and from the judgment and sentence which followed, they appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Moore.
1. The defendants, Joseph Parr and Samuel Gaston, were, with another party, jointly charged with the crime of assault and robbery while being armed with dangerous weapons, “to wit: pistols.” The crime was alleged to *318have been committed as follows: “The said Joseph Parr, Samuel Gaston, and John Doe, acting together on the 3d day of November, A. D. 1908, in the county of Umatilla and state of Oregon, then and there being and acting together, did then and there with intent, if resisted, to kill or wound one Peter Willox, assault him, the said Peter Willox, they…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McBride v. Northern Pacific R. R.Oregon Supreme Court · 1890
- State v. HumphreysOregon Supreme Court · 1902
- Bull v. ConroeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
- State v. HorneOregon Supreme Court · 1891
- State v. HerronMontana Supreme Court · 1892
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State of Oregon v. LaneganOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. RaganOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- State v. LinvilleOregon Supreme Court · 1928
- State v. MiloOregon Supreme Court · 1928
- State v. EllisonOregon Supreme Court · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.