Legal Opinion

Gadda v. Gadda

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 2006No. CC DR0111242; CA A123921; SC S52228PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, C. J.

This case requires us to determine whether an appellant “delivered” a notice of appeal, pursuant to ORCP 9 B, sufficient to provide the Court of Appeals with appellate jurisdiction. The Court of Appeals held that husband, the appellant, failed to serve the notice of appeal and dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. For the reasons outlined below, we conclude that husband timely served the notice of appeal. We therefore reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and reinstate the appeal.

The relevant facts are as follows. In mid-November 2003, attorney Phil Cobb began representing Kathleen Gadda…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Stevens v. CzerniakOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  5. McCall v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wieck v. HostetterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ObertOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. TannehillOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Stonecrest Properties, LLC v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. Ann Sacks Tile & Stone, Inc. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API