Legal Opinion

State v. Tannehill

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 2006No. CC 0200246CR; CA A121217; SC S52929PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

ORS 131.125 (2001) 1 sets out the limitation periods within which the state may commence criminal prosecutions. One paragraph of that statute provides that, at the latest, the state must commence a prosecution for third-degree sexual abuse either within four years of the abuse or, if the victim is under 18 years of age when the abuse occurs, within four years of the victim’s eighteenth birthday. ORS 131.125(3)(a). Another paragraph provides an extended limitations period for certain offenses if the offense “is based upon misconduct in office by a public officer or employee[.]” ORS…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Carlson v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. GulleyOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Gonzalez v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Gadda v. GaddaOregon Supreme Court · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. DeJongOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  2. State v. DinsmoreOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. State v. HensleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. State v. DahlenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API