Legal Opinion
Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Institutional Securities of Colorado, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 30, 2002No. 01-1179PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Defendant-appellant Abraham Goldberg appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for an order declaring a federal court judgment entered against him in 1978 to be deemed satisfied in full. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
This case arises out of the liquidation of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Peretz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Conetta v. National Hair Care Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- James Edward Clark v. Robert Poulton, Utah State Corrections Department, David Jorgensen, Salt Lake County Sheriff's Office, and John Does I Through XCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. FiorellaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Mark v. MarkColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Universitas Education v. Avon CapitalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
- Hill v. Stephens County SheriffDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2025
- Scheid, as Successors to Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. GoldbergSupreme Court of the United States · 2002