Legal Opinion

Cadle Co. II, Inc. v. Fiscus

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 12, 2008No. G039037PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

O’LEARY, J.

— The Cadle Company II, Inc. (Cadle), appeals from the trial court’s order granting Wayne Fiscus’s motion to quash service of summons in its action to revive a 1992 money judgment against Fiscus. The trial court concluded the independent action to enforce the judgment required Fiscus have current contacts with the State of California and the original judgment did not suffice for minimum contacts. We disagree and reverse the order.

FACTS

In 1991, Fiscus defaulted on a promissory note, executed in California in 1987, held by Union Bank. Union Bank assigned the debt to The Best…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Watkins v. ConwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Pratali v. GatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. McGraw v. ParsonsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Boaz v. Boyle & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. As You Sow v. Crawford Laboratories, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Strasner v. Touchstone Wireless Repair & Logistics, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Petersen v. WhitsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  3. Hauser v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API