United States v. Richards
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.
The power of legislatures to declare premises where intoxicating liquor is unlawfully manufactured, kept, or sold to be public nuisances, and the equitable jurisdiction of courts, under as well as independently of statutory authorization, to abate such nuisances by injunction, without the right of trial by jury, has been frequently recognized and sustained. Mugler v. Kansas, 123 U. S. 623, 8 Sup. Ct. 273; State ex rel. Att’y Gen. v. Stoughton Club, 163 Wis. 362, 365, 158 N. W. 93; State ex rel. Att’y Gen. v. Thekan, 184 Wis. 42, 198 N. W. 729; State v. Zimmerman, 317 Ill. 197, 148 N. E. 5;…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Claflin v. HousemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Murphy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lewinsohn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1921
- United States v. BoyntonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1924
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bowles v. Barde Steel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1945
- State v. WellerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
- Miller v. Mun. Court of L. A.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Miller v. Mun. Court of L. A.California Supreme Court · 1943