Legal Opinion
Miller v. Mun. Court of L. A.
California Supreme Court
Decided September 30, 1943No. S. F. 16905Published
1Opinion of the Court
22 Cal.2d 818 (1943)
BRADSTREET MILLER, JR., Petitioner,
v.
MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Respondents; PRENTISS M. BROWN, Administrator, Office of Price Administration, Intervener.
S. F. No. 16905.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
Sept. 30, 1943.
Bradstreet Miller, Jr., in pro. per. for Petitioner.
Robert W. Kenny, Attorney General, ChaS.W. Johnson, Deputy Attorney General, Bartley C. Crum and Benjamin Dreyfus as Amici Curiae on Behalf of Petitioner.
J. H. O'Connor, County Counsel, S. V. O. Prichard, Assistant County Counsel, and W. B. McKesson, Deputy County Counsel, for…
2Cases cited127 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.