Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Miller v. Mun. Court of L. A.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1943No. S. F. 16905Published

1ConcurrenceCarter, J.

I concur in the conclusion reached in the opinion prepared by Mr. Justice Edmonds that a peremptory writ of mandate should issue in this ease directing the municipal court sitting as a small claims court in the city of Los Angeles to proceed with the trial of the case of Miller v. O’Farrell, but, as I am not in accord with all of the views expressed in said opinion, I am disposed to present my views in a separate opinion.

As I see the problem presented for consideration, it is first, whether the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942. (56 Stats., 23, 50 U.S.C.A.App. secs. 901-946) is…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API