Legal Opinion
Buttram v. Finley
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 14, 1946No. Civ. 7185PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
In a former appeal in this case this court reversed a judgment in favor of defendants and directed the trial court to render judgment for plaintiffs quieting title in them to their undivided one-half interest in the real property in Sonoma County which is involved on this appeal. (Buttram v. Finley, 37 Cal.App.2d 459 [99 P.2d 1093].) Upon rehearing of a designated issue, instead of complying with the mandate of this court, after a decree of distribution in the estate of Henry Clay Mizer, deceased, originally entered in 1880, had been amended nunc pro tunc, over the objection of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Goodenow v. EwerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Estate of GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- McWhorter v. McWhorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Pico v. ColumbetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Rice v. SchmidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- George Mefford v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- Kenney v. KenneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Hunter v. SchultzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Van Diest v. Van DiestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- McCulloch v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.