Legal Opinion

McCulloch v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 4, 1949No. Civ. 14151PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

This proceeding is the aftermath of our decision in McCulloch v. Liguori, 88 Cal.App.2d 366 [199 P.2d 25], and is based upon a petition for a writ of mandate, certiorari or prohibition, whichever is appropriate, to undo the action of the trial court in granting a new trial in the above mentioned case. On such petition, we issued an alternative writ of mandate.

Facts

There is no dispute as to the facts. In the Liguori case we reversed the judgment of the trial court insofar as it denied recovery to the plaintiff in excess of the sum of $750, and directed that court, inasmuch as there was no…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Holtum v. GriefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Harris v. Mun. Court of L.A.California Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Andersen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Lancel v. PostlethwaiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Hampton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Cembrook v. Sterling Drug Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. McFarland v. KellyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Devens v. GoldbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API