Legal Opinion

Van Diest v. Van Diest

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 16, 1968No. Civ. 31752PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKingsley, J.

This is an appeal from an order (denominated “Modification of Final Judgment of Divorce”) entered after a hearing following a remittitur from this court on an earlier appeal.

The parties were married on June 2, 1946. Two children were born to the marriage. The parties separated on April 27, 1962; and, on May 1, 1962, plaintiff filed a complaint for divorce. An order to show cause was heard on May 8, 1962, and the court issued a pendente lite order ordering defendant husband to pay $35 per week per child for child support and $25 per week as alimony. The interlocutory decree was granted on…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gudelj v. GudeljCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Hampton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Keck v. KeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Wilson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. English v. Olympic Auditorium, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Silva v. SilvaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
  3. In Re Marriage of NealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Monterey County v. CornejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. LoBue v. State ex rel. Department of HighwaysNevada Supreme Court · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API