Legal Opinion

Huntley v. Southern Oregon Sales, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 13, 1939No. 8501PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANEY, Circuit Judge.

The question presented is whether a claim for refund of an amount paid by appellee to cover an illegal assessment of an income tax must be filed within two years after the amount was paid, as pro vided in § 322(b) (1) of the Revenue Act of 1928, 26 U.S.C.A. § 322 note, or whether it may be filed within four years after the amount was paid, as provided in Rev. St. § 3228, as amended by § 1112 of the Revenue Act of 1926, 26 U.S.C.A. § 1433. The court below decided that the latter statute was applicable.

During all times material herein, ap-pellee was a cooperative…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Chicago Golf ClubCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jones v. Liberty Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. González Padín Co. v. Tribunal de Contribuciones de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1947
  3. United States v. Lederer Terminal Warehouse Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  4. Huntley v. Southern Oregon Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  5. Usibelli Coal Mine v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API