Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Horowitz
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 21, 1984No. A016450PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KING, J.
In this case we hold that the trial court in a dissolution proceeding retains jurisdiction to modify the amount of spousal support, upon a showing of changed circumstances, pending an appeal from an order for spousal support in the dissolution judgment. Sarah Miriam Kline Horowitz appeals from portions of a postjudgment order modifying her spousal support award and terminating a wage assignment. We affirm the order.
Facts
Sarah filed a petition for dissolution of marriage in 1978, after a 17-year marriage to Seymour Horowitz. In the interlocutory judgment of dissolution, filed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lerner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Hall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- In Re Marriage of KuppingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Summers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- In Re Marriage of BrigdenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. DelfinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Pazderka v. Caballeros Dimas Alang, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Betz v. PankowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Elsea v. SaberiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Franklin & Franklin v. 7-Eleven Owners for Fair FranchisingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.