Legal Opinion

Singles v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 11, 1926No. E-436PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, Chief Justice

The plaintiff sues to recover the amount of an alleged adjusted-service certificate in which she was named as beneficiary, provided for in the World War adjusted compensation act, 43 Stat. 121. She contends that the court has jurisdiction of the case as being that of a claim founded upon a law of Congress, and that there is no exclusive or any other remedy provided in the act.

*436On the other hand, defendant insists (1) that the claim is one “ arising out of the pension laws,” and for that reason is not within the court’s jurisdiction, and (2) that the application relied upon by plaintiff was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rock Island, Arkansas & Louisiana Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Martin's Administrator v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. United States v. Emery, Bird, Thayer Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. United States v. Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. McKnight v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lemly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
  2. Betts v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1926
  3. Fees for Affidavits by Veterans, Pennsylvania Department of Justice1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API