Legal Opinion

Betts v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 1, 1926No. D-978PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, Chief Justice

The plaintiff became a partner in the firm of Funch, Edye & Co. in September, 1916, at which time articles of co-partnership between parties in interest were executed. The firm was an old one and had conducted a profitable business for many years. Its business was that of representing foreign ship owners who had business in New York, looking after their ships’ interests, discharging the cargoes, and obtaining for them outward cargoes. It was very largely a *7personal business that required a comparatively small capital, usually invested in seats in one or more of the exchanges, in furniture and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. United States v. Emery, Bird, Thayer Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Brown Chemical Co. v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Metropolitan Bank v. St. Louis Dispatch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Medbury v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dodge Brothers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  2. Vita-Food Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API