Legal Opinion

Lemly v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 5, 1948No. 47665PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWELL, Judge.

Plaintiff is a Naval Reserve Officer on inactive duty and on the honorary retired list of the United States Naval Reserve. He is drawing no retirement pay and the Navy Department has denied his eligibility thereto although he alleges he incurred a disability while on active service which, though known to the Navy at the time he was released from active duty, was not revealed to him. Plaintiff claims therefore the retired pay and allowances accorded by statute to an officer in the Regular Navy of corresponding grade and rank, to which he says he is entitled under the provisions…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pope v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Denby v. BerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Blackett v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1935
  5. Hornblass v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  2. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  4. In Re Marriage of FithianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Ronald J. Cornetta v. The United States of America and John Lehman, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API