Pico v. Cohn
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of 'Los Angeles County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
— This is an action by the plaintiff and appellant to compel the reconveyance of certain real property conveyed by.him to the defendant, on the grounds: 1. That the same was conveyed as security for money borrowed; and 2. That the conveyance was procured by fraud.
Preliminary to a discussion of the merits of the case, we are called upon to determine whether the matters presented by the statement on motion for a new trial can be considered. The respondent contends that the statement must be disregarded for the reason that no *385notice of intention to move for a new trial is set out therein or in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Calderwood v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Dominguez v. MascottiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Girdner v. BeswickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Wright v. SnowballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Bernal v. O'HanlonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by27 opinions
- Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Schneider v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Scott v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Monterey County v. CushingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Kahn v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.