Legal Opinion
Girdner v. Beswick
California Supreme Court
Decided March 20, 1886No. 9843PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Siskiyou County refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
This action was brought to recover two thousand do,liars damages for breach of a contract entered into between plaintiffs and defendant. The contract is as follows:—■
“ $4,500. Siskiyou Co., Cal., June 20, 1882.
“ For and in consideration of the sum of four thousand five hundred dollars in hand paid, I this day sell my entire band of horses, mules, and jack to J. Girdner and J. W. George, except five head of horses reserved, and X hereby agree, when gathered up, that there shall be 170 head, not including the colts of 1882, brand, hat brand (—~—). Provided that there shall not be some disease,…
2Cited by10 opinions
- J. S. Potts Drug Co. v. BenedictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- King v. Pony Gold Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1903
- Arnold v. SinclairMontana Supreme Court · 1892
- Randall v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.