Legal Opinion

Myers v. Quenzer

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1961No. File 9905, 9906PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRentto, J.

The plaintiffs in these automobile collision eases are husband and wife. In his action Mr. Myers seeks recovery for injuries to his person and the car. Mrs. Myers claims damages for injuries to her person. The cases were consolidated for trial. At the conclusion of such proceedings, during which the jury and the trial judge viewed the scene of the accident, the trial court directed verdicts for both plaintiffs and submitted to the jury only the question of damages. Mr. Myers was awarded $650 and Mrs. Myers $7,500. Judgments were entered in these amounts from which the defendants appeal urging…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hansen v. IsaakSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Bogh v. BeadlesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Ford v. RobinsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Johnson v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Haase v. Willers Truck Service, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Johnson v. John Deere Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Nelson v. Nelson Cattle Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Stoltz v. StonecypherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Bartak v. Bell-Galyardt & Wells, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  5. Ehlers v. Chrysler Motor CorporationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API