Legal Opinion

Willie J. Sorrels v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 7, 1986No. 83-7600PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner Willie Sorrels seeks review of the Secretary of Labor’s decision that he was disqualified for benefits under the Redwood Employee Protection Program (“REPP”). This is one of many appeals to this court pursuant to section 103(h) of the Redwood National Park Expansion Act of 1978 (“Redwood Act”), 16 U.S.C. § 79/(h) (1982), requiring us to interpret provisions of that Act. See, e.g., Cavendar v. Donovan, 752 F.2d 1376 (9th Cir.1985); Barnes v. Donovan, 720 F.2d 1111 (9th Cir.1983); *907Lanning v. Marshall, 650 F.2d 1055 (9th Cir.1981).

The Redwood Act was passed in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. William F. Lanning v. Honorable Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. Emma L. David v. Honorable Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Darrell Barnes, and J.J. Schroeder v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Local 3-98, International Woodworkers of America, Afl-Cio v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. Helen R. Cavender v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Willie J. Sorrels v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API