Legal Opinion

Helen R. Cavender v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 29, 1985No. 83-7237PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This case arises under Title II of the Redwood National Park Expansion Act of 1978, Pub.L. No. 95-250, §§ 201-13, 92 Stat. 163, 172-82. The Secretary of Labor denied Helen R. Cavender’s claim for benefits under the Redwood Employee Protection Program (REPP) because she was not an “affected employee” as defined in the Act but voluntarily quit in order to follow her husband to a new job in Oregon. We affirm.

Under the Redwood Act, employees who are eligible for California State Unemployment Compensation are eligible for REPP benefits if they are “affected employees.” Section 201(11) defines…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. John E. Demarinis v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Curtis W. Holt v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Rama D. Sanders v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Willie J. Sorrels v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Curtis W. Holt v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Willie J. Sorrels v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API