Legal Opinion
Schick v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided December 18, 2007No. Slip Op. 07-182; Court 06-00279PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STANCEU, Judge.
Plaintiffs Arthur C. Schick III (“Schick”) and Schick International Forwarding, Inc. (“Schick International”) brought this action to contest the revocation of Schick’s customs broker’s license for failure to file a timely status report (“triennial report”) with Customs and Border Protection, United States Department of Homeland Security (“Customs”) as required by Section 641(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1641(g) (2000). At the time they brought this action, plaintiffs also sought to prevent Customs from revoking Schick International’s corporate…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Alden Leeds, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
- Netchem, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Almond Bros. Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Almond Bros. Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
- Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.