Legal Opinion

Almond Bros. Lumber Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided April 8, 2010No. Court 08-00036Errata

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Introduction

EATON, Judge:

Before the court is plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration of the May 20, 2009, 1 opinion dismissing their cause of action for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. See USCIT R. 59; Almond Bros. Lumber Co. v. United States, 33 CIT _, Slip Op. 09-48 (May 20, 2009) (“Almond Bros. I"). See Pls.’ Mem. Supp. Mot. Reconsideration (“Pis.’ Mem.”); Defs.’ Resp. Mot. Reconsideration (“Defs.’ Resp.”); and Pis.’ Reply (“Pis.’ Reply”).

The disputed jurisdictional issue concerns the legal authority by which the United States Trade Representative (“USTR”) negotiated and entered…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Nixon v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Cochran v. Quest Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  5. Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States, and U.S. Magnesium LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API