Legal Opinion
Aldridge v. Jackson Township
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 16, 2009No. 2217 C.D. 2008PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SIMPSON.
In this land use appeal, Objectors 1 ask whether the Jackson Township Board of Supervisors (Supervisors) erred in granting JRAD Ventures, Inc.’s (Applicant) conditional use application. The Supervisors determined Applicant’s proposed indoor shooting range qualified as a “recreation facility” as defined by the Jackson Township Zoning Ordinance (zoning ordinance). The Supervisors also determined Applicant’s proposed retail gun and supply store, club room, gunsmith and classrooms and training rooms, which would be developed in connection with the proposed indoor shooting…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Adams Outdoor Adv., Lp. v. Zoning Hearing Bd. of Smithfield TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Caln Nether Co., L.P. v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- In Re Appeal of McGlynnCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Gilden AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Broussard v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Appeal of Richboro CD Partners, L.P.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Adhi Parasakthi Charitable, Medical, Educational, & Cultural Society of North America v. Township of West PikelandDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Newtown Square East, L.P. v. Township of NewtownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Atiyeh v. BD. OF COM'RS OF TP. OF BETHLEHEMCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- In Re: Appeal of AMA/American Marketing Association, Inc. from the Decision of the Borough Council of Ambler Borough, dated October 15, 2013Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.