Legal Opinion
United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 26, 1997No. Crim.A. 91-0655 JHGPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In re Third Round Petition of Banco Central Del Uruguay
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOYCE HENS GREEN, District Judge.
Presently pending is the United States’ Motion to Dismiss (“Motion to Dismiss”) the Verified Petition of Banco Central del Uruguay (“Banco Central”), which was filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1963(() (“L-Claim”). The government has moved to dismiss the L-Claim due to lack of standing and for failure to state a claim. For the reasons expressed below, the Motion to Dismiss will be granted.
BACKGROUND
The facts surrounding BCCI’s collapse are well known in the financial and legal…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- United States v. ReckmeyerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Lawrence W. Lavin Wmot Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- United States v. EmorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- United States v. EmorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013